Well, that's an interesting number because that means it's a selective counterforce strike, which means that the presidential decision would be a little more difficult. We're under nuclear attack." (Scattered laughter.) That kind of wakes you up.īRZEZINSKI: And he adds 30 seconds ago, 200 Soviet missiles have been fired at the United States. at night on the red phone and said, "Sorry to wake you up. I got a message from my military assistant, a general, who simply woke me up at 3:00 a.m. And then 28 minutes later, some of us would be dead and we'd be living in a different age. And then he would have four minutes to decide how to respond. During those three minutes, I had to confirm it in a variety of ways. I had three minutes in which to notify him. presidents are currently given a four-minute window to decide whether or not to initiate an irreversible apocalypse."īRZEZINSKI: Part of my job was to coordinate the response if something like that happened, to notify the president. ".the bottom line is that he recalled having only three minutes to decide whether or not to inform the president, after which the president had four minutes to decide whether or not to retaliate."įOREIGN POLICY MAGAZINE: Our Nuclear Procedures Are Crazier Than Trump Zbigniew Brzezinski - Former National Security Advisor- the guy who was responsible for getting the nuclear call, and notifying the president: Impressive.Ĭlick to expand.It's not Top Secret, and it's been common knowledge. The OP cited a bull(*)(*)(*)(*), made-up story to claim it was. It has also been the subject of academic and political studies: I mean, how gullible are you guys? You just believe anything you read on the Internet? FFS.Īs to the contention that this information is classified, that will come as news to readers of Foreign Policy and other publications over the years. Nothing they've written has ever panned out. The source in the OP is a bull(*)(*)(*)(*) website called True Pundit, which has already been caught simply making stuff up and attributing it all to anonymous sources. Five pages in which only one person questioned the fact that the source in the OP is complete bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |